« Hanso Foundation run by a cross-dresser? | Main | Harvard Shmarvard »

May 12, 2006

Mac Ads are funny but are they correct?

applepromo.jpg

So Apple has been running a new series of ads on TV where a middle aged "dorky" looking guy in a suit represents a "PC" and some hip young guy is supposed to represent a Mac.

Now while the ads are fresh, new and entertaining, I'm not sure if they are actually technically correct.

A few examples:

In "Network" the ad explains that PC's and Macs can network together. Then the introduce a new "camera" into the picture and show that the Mac can talk to the camera, but the PC can't. "Everything just kind of works with a mac," they say. As far as I know, PC's probably have more drivers written for them and are compatible with more models of cameras than Mac's.

In "Virus" the ad shows a PC with a virus and the Mac not being concerned about getting a virus. Not only can Mac's get viruses, it's also dangerous for Mac users to think that they're immune to viruses.

In "Better" and "iLife" the mac claims to be better at things like movies, music and pictures due to the fact that the software is bundled with the OS. While this may be true, this isn't to say that you can't do everything and maybe evern better than the bundled software on Mac's with Free and Retail PC programs. The other interesting fact is that if Microsoft did decide to bundle all of this software with Windows, I'm pretty sure we'd hear the pitter patter of lawyer footsteps and the shouting of anti-trust.

In "WSJ" it's amusing because they quote Mossberg as saying that the Mac is the "finest desktop PC on the market at any price." So is a mac a pc? anyways, they go on to ask if the PC guy has received any reviews, and the PC guy fumbles at the question and makes up a fake magazine name. To imply that PC's haven't received favorable reviews from the media is kind of ridiculous too.

While I am impressed by the Mac, and their ads have always been different and interesting, I'm not sure if they're always or ever based on fact.


Posted by Bryant at May 12, 2006 03:58 PM

Comments

Well, I recently picked up a macbook pro, and i have to say i'm absolutely in love with it. As you know, I've been using PCs for nearly 2 decades, and at various times I've even been fairly anti-mac. So, I totally get where you're coming from, but I've got a few things to add.

Mac's actually do work with pretty much any camera /without/ specifically installing drivers. iPhoto recognizes that it's a camera, mounts it as a volume, tracks down any image files, and imports them. They finally came to terms with the fact that manuafacturers don't really write mac drivers, so they put in a workaround that covers most machines.

Virus: agreed. it is dangerous for mac users to think they're immune, but I don't run antivirus software at the moment.

I've really come to think of macs differently--especially the intel macs. Apple hardware is elegant, high end stuff, and OS X is an extremely workable BSD distro. As a Unixen server administrator, having my familiar toolset part of the default install is great. And as someone who supports Windows users, being able to dual-boot to XP or trivially run a virtual machine with any x86-compatible OS is a godsend. I've got a 5 pound aluminum box with 2GB of ram, a 7200rpm sata drive, bluetooth, b/g wifi and a dvd burner that contains the exact operating environments of all my clients. Could this be done on a traditional PC? Mostly. But how many other vendors are really putting it all together so simply?

iLife is fine and all, but it's the little stuff that really sets Apple apart--like built in cameras, ambient light-sensing keyboards, and a/v remote controls. Does that stuff make my work easier? Maybe not much, if at any, but every time i tap the side of my screen to switch to another virtual desktop* i still giggle a bit (at least inside).

--j.

* Haven't heard of the Smackbook? Watch: http://www.youtube.com/v/6uvQTTPr9Rw

Posted by: joshua at June 11, 2006 04:30 PM

patek replica watches replica authentic watches

Posted by: for replica watches at May 20, 2007 06:47 PM

hcl tramadol 50 hcl tramadol in

Posted by: tramadol hcl 50 at July 11, 2007 02:08 AM

hcl tramadol 50 hcl tramadol in

Posted by: tramadol hcl 50 at July 11, 2007 02:08 AM

replica watches lange watches replica panerai

Posted by: watches replica spam at July 16, 2007 05:01 PM

replica watches lange watches replica panerai

Posted by: watches replica spam at July 16, 2007 05:01 PM

soma lyrics buy soma can buy

Posted by: lower buy soma at March 8, 2008 09:17 PM

online tramadol cheap online tramadol com

Posted by: tramadol online pharmaceutical at March 9, 2008 05:46 AM

online tramadol cheap online tramadol com

Posted by: tramadol online pharmaceutical at March 9, 2008 05:46 AM

diet hoodia hoodia plant

Posted by: gordonii hoodia at April 18, 2008 07:42 AM

diet hoodia hoodia plant

Posted by: gordonii hoodia at April 18, 2008 07:43 AM

news jackson news york

Posted by: news block at May 5, 2008 06:17 PM

news jackson news york

Posted by: news block at May 5, 2008 06:17 PM

teen job blow boy gay hair gay blow teens boy teen job

Posted by: boy gay job rhianna blow teen at July 4, 2008 09:43 PM

teen job blow boy gay hair gay blow teens boy teen job

Posted by: boy gay job rhianna blow teen at July 4, 2008 09:43 PM

lamosil lamisil lamisil foot

Posted by: effects lamisil at July 20, 2008 01:05 PM

lamosil lamisil lamisil foot

Posted by: effects lamisil at July 20, 2008 01:05 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)