News For You

Full text of the court order:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IMMERSION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC., SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Defendants.

No. C 02-0710 CW

JUDGMENT

This action came on for trial before the Court, the Honorable Claudia Wilken, United States District Judge, presiding, and the issues having been duly tried and the Jury having duly rendered its verdict as to the claims presented to it, and the Court having entered its findings as to the defense of inequitable conduct,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

That judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Immersion Corp. (Immersion) against Defendants Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., (SCEA) and Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., (SCEI) (collectively Sony) on Immersion's claims of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,424,333 and 6,275,213. Judgment is also entered in Immersion's favor on Sony's counter-claims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement. Immersion shall recover of Defendants SCEA and SCEI jointly and severally the amount of $82,000,000.00. This sum shall be paid directly to Immersion forthwith; no escrow account is required. In accordance with the portion of the Court's January 10, 2005 order awarding Immersion pre-judgment interest at the prime rate, Immersion shall recover of Defendants pre-judgment
interest in the amount of $8,703,608.00.1 Immersion shall recover its costs from Sony.

In a separate order, the Court also issues a permanent injunction against Sony, stayed pending appeal to the Federal Circuit, and a compulsory license fee for the duration of the
stay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 3/24/05

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IMMERSION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC., SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
Defendants.

No. C 02-0710 CW

ORDER ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL

For the reasons set forth in its January 10, 2005 Order, and having entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff Immersion Corp. (Immersion), the Court hereby PERMANENTLY ENJOINS Defendants Sony Computer Entertainment America, Inc., (SCEA) and Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., (SCEI) (collectively Sony) from manufacturing, using, and/or selling in, or importing into, the United States the infringing Sony Playstation system, including its Playstation consoles, Dualshock controllers, and those games found by the jury to infringe. [FN1: The jury found that the following games, in conjunction with the Playstation consoles and Dualshock controllers, infringed either the '213 patent, the '333 patent or both patents: A Bug's Life; Amplitude; Ape Escape; Atlantis: The Lost Empire; Bloody Roar 2; Cool Boarders 3; Cool Boarders 4; Cool Boarders 2001; Crash Bash; Crash Team Racing; Drakan: The Ancients' Gate; Emperor's New Groove; Extermination; FantaVision; Final Fantasy X; Formula One 2001; The Getaway; Gran Turismo; Gran Turismo 2; Gran Turismo 3; Grand Theft Auto: Vice City; Grand Theft Auto 3; Grind Session; ICO; Jak & Daxter; Kinetica; Kingdom Hearts; Legend of the Dragoon; The Mark of Kri; Medal of Honor Frontline; Medievil 2; Metal Gear Solid 2; Monster's, Inc.; Sly Cooper and the Thievius Racoonus; SOCOM Navy Seals; Speed Punks; Spyro: Ripto's Rage; Spyro: Year of the Dragon; Stuart Little 2; Syphon Filter 2; Syphon Filter 3; Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3; Twisted Metal: Black; Twisted Metal 4; Twisted Metal: Small Brawl; Treasure Planet; and War of the Monsters.] As described in the January 10 Order, no recall is required of products already sold, but Sony will pay a license fee on all products already placed in the stream of commerce.

The Court GRANTS Sony's counter-motion for a stay (Docket No. 1370) of the injunction pending appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(c). In making this determination, the Court considers the strength of Sony's showing that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its appeal, whether Sony will be irreparably injured absent a stay, whether the stay will substantially injure Immersion, and where the public interest lies. Standard Havens Products, Inc., v. Gencor Indus., Inc., 897 F.2d 511, 512 (Fed. Cir. 1990), quoting Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776, (1987). The Court finds that on balance, these factors weigh in favor of granting a stay. None of the authority cited by Immersion suggests that a stay of the injunction pending appeal would be an abuse of discretion. As long as the injunction is stayed, the compulsory license remains in effect.

Sony has filed with the Court a "supplemental submission" of updated sales data for the year 2004. Sony's evidence shows that the games found by the jury to infringe now represent a smaller proportion of overall game sales; for instance, none of the top ten best-selling games for 2004 were accused. See Mehta Decl., Ex. D, TRSTS Report for December 2004. On the other hand, Immersion has provided the Court with supplemental evidence from its expert, Dr. Colgate, showing that Sony has continued to release games that contain the complex vibration found by the jury to infringe. See Colgate Decl. 5-6. As Sony notes, "the video game industry is driven by trends," and "games go in and out of style in months." Sony Supplemental Submission Re: Updated Sales Data Relevant to Motions for Injunction and Stay at 2. Absent evidence from Sony that it has redesigned its products so as to avoid the systems and methods found by the jury to infringe, the Court declines to revise the scope of its injunction based on the introduction of new games and the decline in popularity of the accused games.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 3/24/05

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge